Modul IPA Terpadu, Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 7Malang yang Menggunakan Modul IPA Terpadu dengan Model Pembelajaran Integrasi Tema Pemuaian Pada Berbagai Wujud Zat.
Keywords:
Integrated Science Module, Integration Learning Model, Learning Achievement.Abstract
ABSTRACT
To support Integrated Science learning, an integrated learning resource is needed, so that harmony between learning models and learning resources is created, namely the Integrated Science module. Based on this, it was tried to apply the module on Integrated Science learning with the hypothesis that students 'learning achievements taught with Integrated Science modules with integrated learning models with high initial abilities were better than students' learning achievements taught without Integrated Science modules with high initial abilities and also vice versa. The purpose of applying this module is to find out the differences in student achievement. The research method used is a quantitative approach with a type of quasi-experimental research with different treatments in both samples. The class used is 7A as an experiment and 7B as a control class. For the experimental class learning activities are accompanied by modules with integration learning models, while the control class is without modules. Then to test the hypothesis used ANOVA AB Statistical Test followed by Scheffe Test. Students' abilities are distinguished from the class average, if above the class average is called high ability and vice versa. From the results of the two post test classes, the average experimental class = 65.11> 51.44 (control class). While the ANOVA Statistics results obtained thitung = 5.002> 2.01575 (t45; .05) which means that student learning achievement taught with Integrated Science module with integrated learning models with high initial abilities is better than students' learning achievement taught without modules Integrated Science with high initial ability with experimental class average = 66.38> 54.29 (control class). Whereas for students with low initial abilities, the results of tcount = 6.34> 2.0231 (t39; .05) means that students 'learning achievements taught with Integrated Science modules with integration learning models with low initial abilities are better than students' learning achievements. taught without an Integrated Science module with a low initial ability with an experimental class average = 63.9> 47.54 (control class). It can be said that the module is suitable for students with high initial abilities as well as students with low initial abilities.
References
2. Aristawati, Ika, Vidiasari. 2006. Efektivitas Pembelajaran Dengan Modul Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Danpeningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Gerak Lurus Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Laboratorium UM Tahun Pelajaran 2005/2006. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: FMIPA UM.
3. Baady, Joni Fairuzza. 2009. Penerapan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Model Integrasi (Integrated Model) Berbasis Konstruktivisme Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIIC SMPN 4 Malang Tahun Ajaran 2008/2009. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: FMIPA UM.
4. Erman. 2003. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: JICA.
5. Furchan, Arif. 1982. Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
6. Mulyasa. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
7. Munadi, Yudhi. 2008. Media Pembelajaran Sebuah Pendekatan Baru. Jakarta: GP Press.
8. Nasution. 2000. Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: PT Bumi Aksara.
9. Nur, Mohamad. 1998. Teori-Teori Pendidikan: Fondasi untuk Pengajaran. Surabaya: Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Surabaya.
10. Setyosari, Punaji. 1991. Pengajaran Modul. Malang: IKIP Malang Proyek Operasi dan Perawatan Fasilitas.
11. Sujianto, Agus Eko. 2007. Aplikasi Statistik dengan SPSS Untuk Pemula. Jakarta: Prestasi Pusaka Publisher.
12. Sungkowo, Bambang Tahan. 2003. Statistik Dasar. Malang: FMIPA UM.
13. Supranata, Sumarna. 2003. Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
14. Susilo, Amin. 2008. Usaha Peningkatan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Melalui Sistem Tutorial dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Surakarta: FKIP UMM Surakarta.
15. Trianto. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
16. Winarsunu, Tulus. 2004. Statistik Dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Malang: UM Press.
17. Winkel. 1996. Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Garsindo.
18. Wiyono, Bambang Budi. 2003. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Malang: FIP Universitas Negeri Malang.
19. Puskur, Balitbang Depdiknas. 2009. Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, (Online), (http://images.amurakidi.multiply.com/attachment, diakses tanggal 11 April 2010).
20. Ridwan. 2002. Ketercapaian Prestasi Belajar,,(Online), (http://.wordpress.com, diakses tanggal 11 Mei 2010).